Securing views Berg

OK, I admit! I liked Robinson from Section 1 in year 1 and was highly critical of the special Penn Club's criticism then. It's an extremely exciting insight into how groups work under pressure and actually very educational, even if the TV productions obviously sharpens everything.

Interestingly, this time it was for me Nina and Kristian, both played pact games. Kristian went to Kristian and played the game himself. When all of Sweden since got to know Christian as a real crap boot - probably while he himself did - as opposed, he married and had actually place in the media to deserve this - but none of what he said changed anything. The guy is monumentally disgusting. Nina played the game as an RPG. Did not dominate the competitions was so smooth that she was hanging all the way until only the competition head to head were counted and then she was no longer. Therefore think that the criticism that she did not keep the words miss the point with Robinson as a contest.

The embarrassment becomes this year's winner, by far the weakest and least worthy winner a year (with the reservation that I have not seen it when it went on TV3). Being bland, rarely a burden but never any asset and definitely always just filler so she slipped all the way through. Would definitely recommend this one of my favorite books - Ben Elton's "Night guest" which illustrates how the beige win and it's boring!

A proposal for next year is that every time let örådet vote out of two participants. These will then compete to be left (as Erik Billing and Jarmo did this year). In this way, the worthy winner always save themselves and left it hanging loose then have the choice to vote for the one you should be able to beat in a duel or who is a major threat. Would actually create an extra dimension to the drama!